Zeev's Turnips Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Carl R. who wrote (283)	12/7/2000 8:32:47 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (4) of 644

According to Boies, the way to overturn Sauls is on the basis of the fact that Sauls did not examine the evidences (the ballots), and supposedly, that overturn will be on a matter of law (thus not overturning on findings of facts?). Listening to the Seminole case yesterday, I got the impression that they spent quite sometime to determine if the misdeed of the Republican would have impact the final result of the election. I did not realize that laws need to be obeyed only if the results of breaking the law would impact in one way or another future macro events, that is a strange principle, embezzlers of funds from a company which is on the verge of Ch 7 or 11 can get free reign since whether they did or did not embezzle the company would have gone under anyway. Is that a constructive interpretation of that thesis? Zeev

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next