SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JDinBaltimore who wrote (35665)12/7/2000 11:36:04 PM
From: Bruce Tiemann  Read Replies (1) of 50167
 
"The opening statements were pretty serious coming from the plaintiffs, actually criminal. The way Gore has acted, I don't wish to see him victorious, but this Martin Co. case is serious.. "

It comes down to if the judge will rule on law or on politics. As for the law:

42 US CODE SECTION 1971: No person acting under color of law shall . . . deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under state law to vote in such election…

It would seem the "full, fair, and accurate" count is not meant to include some 15,000 absentee ballots, nor additional thousands of military votes. Now, why could that be?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext