SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ron Morse who wrote (3678)6/27/1996 1:13:00 PM
From: Rod Patten   of 58324
 
To whomever:

Nice to see Iomega get a lift so I don't have to read the spew
from all the bitter ones who either didn't get in on the IOMG
ride or got caught with their shorts down.

If there is a "flight to quality" whenever the DOW is up and
the NASDAQ is down, does it mean there is a "flight from quality"
when the DOW is down and the NASDAQ is up? Strangely, I never
hear our entertainers on CNBC use the second term and today
would seem to be a good day for such jargon.

By the way, although I don't give much consideration to the
comments under the graph, I sometimes like to amuse myself
with the jibberish written there. What do you people think
of the way somebody has been sabotaging the chart page for
Iomega the last couple of days? Obviously we have
some children who like to play there. I'd hate to see that behavior
spread to other parts of the SI forum (particularly this thread).
I would be in favor of having SI go back to the practice of
not allowing comments under the Iomega graph but my main worry is
that those wobbly little minds left idle by such a curfew would then
come trundling over to these Iomega threads. Any ideas or comments?

Rod
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext