SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 41.41+2.2%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (121474)12/8/2000 6:27:04 PM
From: Chris Carlson  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
You are completely wrong, Jozef.

This ruling was on the appeal of Judge Saul's ruling. That ruling was on Gore's contest of the election. The USSC ruling was on Bush's suit to stop the recounts (which they didn't hear) and to overturn the FLSC ruling to extend the deadline (which they remanded to the FLSC).

There is no deadline on the remanded case. The FLSC could send their reply to the USSC in March if they wanted.

So, to repeat, the Gore contest is what was ruled on today. Gore seemed to prevail and they are going to count all the undervotes. This has nothing to do whatsoever with the USSC decision.

I know this is confusing, so I hope I helped
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext