SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (106644)12/8/2000 9:08:01 PM
From: TheGodfather (Hijacked)  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
"They have been frantically bad-mouthing manual recounts, suing, stalling and delaying since November 8th. They have used every conceivable argument that has occured to them, all to the same end, to stop any recount. "

You too would be arguing against any recounts when NEW criteria to evaluate voter intent is introduced after the count has started.

Keep in mind that Theresa LePore had sent a letter to all precincts telling officials that ONLY CORRECTLY PUNCHED ballots would be counted. In her letter she specifically states that dimples, bulging chads, pregnant chads and hanging chads were NOT to be considered as votes.

How could anyone trust the fairness of the counts when the are changed to favor one candidate?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext