SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (3555)12/9/2000 10:46:04 AM
From: Triffin  Read Replies (2) of 3887
 
Is this right ??

1)Voter goes to the polls,

2)He/she is 'checked' against a 'list'
of registered voters for the given precinct
to ensure one person one vote ..

3)Voter makes an 'over-vote' mistake ..
ie votes for more than one 'presidential choice'
realizes it, hands in the ballot and requests a
new ballot and subsequently successfully completes
his/her ballot

4)All 'over-vote' ballots from (3) above are set
aside as 'spoiled ballots' to avoid double counting

5)All ballots except 'spoiled ballots' are run through
the vote-matic machine .. this process results in
some number of 'rejects' that the vote-matic machine
fails to read .. the 'rejected' ballots are considered
'under-votes' if there is no choice or an
incomplete choice for the presidential race and
set aside as 'under-votes'

6)Other 'rejected' ballots that the vote-matic machine
failed to read are considered 'over-votes' as they
exhibit that more than one choice for the presidential
race was made ..

Question #1 .. How do we know that the 'over-votes' from
(3) and (6) have been segregated since the Nov 7 th
election and subsequent re-counts across all the
precincts in Florida ?? 'Over-votes'from (3)
should never be re-counted whereas category
(6) 'over-votes' probably have been ..

Question #2 .. After all the counts and re-counts,
is anyone confirming that the 'final valid vote
total per precinct' is a number less than the number
of voters who showed up Nov 7th (2) minus
the number of 'spoiled ballots' (3) ????

Jim in CT ..
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News