SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mishedlo who wrote (7365)12/9/2000 1:41:35 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) of 13572
 
M.....something to consider......
If the wrong man is Enthroned.....Hmmmmm
Tim

To: Keith Feral who wrote (89565)
From: Bux
Friday, Dec 8, 2000 4:54 PM ET
Reply # of 89679

Keith, I have always thought it odd that the undervotes were not counted statewide from the get-go in such a close contest. The law has been pretty clear that
the candidate with the most votes wins and that in a close election we are not to rely only on the "machine" to do the counting. In other words, it is well
recognized that a manual hand count gives a more accurate indication of the will of the people.

Don't you want to make sure our next president was elected properly, not based upon incomplete returns. It will be bad enough if the legally elected president
does not have the popular vote but would add insult to injury if it was later determined that he didn't even carry the electorial vote. After all, those ballots can
be obtained under the freedom of information act. It is important to get the correct count now, not find out later we were wrong.

I am all for a statewide manual count and don't think the Florida Legislature should interfere with the natural voting process. George Bush should have agreed
to a statewide recount from day one.

Yes, it will probably hurt our portfolios in the short-term but the effect should not last long.

Bux
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext