SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (81192)12/9/2000 6:38:35 PM
From: excardog  Read Replies (1) of 95453
 
Douglas

You are probably aware that the BPA is undergoing contract renewals up here. I believe they sign 5 or maybe 10 year contracts with purchasers. CA has also entered into this fray trying to shift power contracts in their direction, at least that's the perception up here. Just wondering what your take is on this.

It would seem to me that if we have excess power to sell it might first be sold to business that employ the residents of BPA member states. My take is California would oppose this and prefer the excess power be sent their direction. It is funny in a way that not so long ago the BPA was in danger of default with the fed's and now they appear to be the apple in everyones eye.

Scott

ps: enjoyed the piece on the ballot counter.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News