Lawdog,
I have been pretty much a silent reader, and find you to be pretty pathetic.
The FSC decision was 4-3, with all Democrats. Not exactly a ringing endorsement for their Friday decision.
The SC decision was 5-4. Not exacly a ringing endorsement for stopping it.
The margin of error in counting 6,000,000 votes would far exceed the margin of victory for either side, despite what anyone thinks is fair.
It has become so convoluted that nobody could possibly ever know who really won, because that snapshot of November 7, 2000 will not ever live again, and the evidence from that day does not, and never will exist in that state again--both legally and physically.
I am glad you have wasted countless hours preaching here. I'm also glad to know that despite allegedly having a law degree, you lack the common sense and objectivity you pine for in the three branches of government.
Kind of like Animal Farm, you are Napoleon. "Two Legs good, four legs bad." Anything favorable to the Democrats good, anything favorable to the Republicans bad. From pig to man, from man to pig, you could no longer tell the difference.
Flip a coin, loser. Bush called Tails, and tails showed. There is no injustice, just the way the coin came down, based on how tight the election really was.
Lastly, being a pro-choice Republican is never a fun thing. I certainly hope that should GW take office, the SC is not stacked against Roe v. Wade. Frankly, I fail to understand how abortion is an SC issue. But for people like you, I hope you twist in the wind agonizing over it. People like me will just accept the consequences and get on with life like adults, like we always do.
G |
