Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sandeep who wrote (37768)	12/9/2000 10:01:34 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (3) of 42787

Sand OT re My point is that Gore started the manipulation by asking for a hand count when he knows that the standard That's what I was doing my best to avoid, "party politics" & the finger pointing that goes with it. I was looking at the system , because this never had to happen to start with, also I know the best solution would be found in the same way it could have been avoided to start with. To nitpick it only lets it come back again and again and again, we need to have run off elections and that should have already been in place long ago. ------------ BTW you'r rooting for Bush is obvious and I might add disingenuous considering how hard I'v tried to leave out any implication of the way the vote should go, my ONLY point is that the "popular" vote without a run off if less than a majority is a screwed up mess to start with. But being you did draw me in I will add that your wrong in thinking Gore started it. Most of us see what we want to see but one fact I do know is that the count was close enough in the first place that the recount was a given and had to happen by Florida Law; no one had to start or request it and no one should obstruct it. The nit picking has been all about how and where it will be done. And I contend not just Florida , but every State where there was not a clear 50%+ for one or the other ought to re-vote. ------------- BTW I voted for Nader even though I knew he didn't have a prayer, he did have some important things to say and I wanted him to know at least some people heard what he was saying. However If I had thought he could have won I wouldn't have voted for him :-) I live in Texas and I'm not so dumb as to know that Bush wouldn't sweep this state. Not that he is so popular here in his own state, but "pork barrel politics is alive and well," By that I mean he didn't and couldn't win as Governor by near the margin in Texas as he did in running for President. I think most Texans would like to see him as President as much as to get him out of the Governors mansion as anything else. Never can I recall any President losing his own State even though history shows some that couldn't win a States janitors job the second time if they had to get it by votes in their own State , however they never failed to rally behind them if they had a shot at being President. it's "pass the pork or don't you dare come back home" type voting. ----------- Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next