Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 75.25

0.0%

11:42 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bambs who wrote (44316)	12/9/2000 11:11:13 PM
From: Tom D	Read Replies (1) of 77400

The issues are pretty thorny, Bambs. I am not confident that this is predictable. There is a compelling argument that democratic counties mostly had antiquated, crappy voting machines that undercounted their votes. (from the Miami Herald, 12.3.00) <<The overall rejection rate for the 43 counties using optical systems was 1.4 percent. The overall rejection rate for the 24 punch-card counties was 3.9 percent. That means that voters in punch-card counties, which included urban Democratic strongholds such as Broward and Palm Beach counties, were nearly three times as likely to have their ballots rejected as those in optical counties.>> The problem is that I think both Supreme courts are just spewing out verbage to justify whatever they feel like doing for whatever personal/political reasons they have. I suppose the the five conservative USSC justices would rather see Bush win and appoint more of the own. We'll have to see. As usual of late, I am happy to be in cash. Tom D

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next