SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Trading the markets.....
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1655)12/10/2000 3:35:02 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III  Read Replies (1) of 4583
 
How can you conveniently over look that the Florida Supreme court also was divided over party lines and that there was such a strongly worded dissenting opinion by the chief justice that the case begged for review by the Supreme court?

The Fla dissent basically said plainly there was no legal basis for this decision and it was an attempt to put Gore in the White House by the Democratic court members voting themselves.

I don't see how the US Supremes could have said no. I don't think they will vote the actual case along party lines. They are only going to see if the dissenting opinion was an attempt at a Bush Push by the chief justice or ir it bears real merit. It could still go either way. I think the dissenting piece made it impossible not to hear.

BWDIK

Good Luck,

Lee
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News