SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rod Patten who wrote (3681)6/27/1996 2:37:00 PM
From: Jay Chaffin   of 58324
 
Rod,

>>By the way, although I don't give much consideration to the
comments under the graph, I sometimes like to amuse myself
with the jibberish written there. What do you people think
of the way somebody has been sabotaging the chart page for
Iomega the last couple of days? Obviously we have
some children who like to play there. I'd hate to see that behavior
spread to other parts of the SI forum (particularly this thread).
I would be in favor of having SI go back to the practice of
not allowing comments under the Iomega graph but my main worry is
that those wobbly little minds left idle by such a curfew would then
come trundling over to these Iomega threads. Any ideas or comments?<<

I too, like to amuse myself and sometimes get good info in the carts area (found
out about the Jaz tie ratio vs Zip tie ratio there first). I don't think
there would be any problem with the "wobbly minds" coming in here and thrashing
the threads. The reason, the can post with fake names (Free Advice, Bald man...,
etc..) while to post in the threads, they must use their SI login and SI
could kick them out. Perhaps, the answer is for SI to eliminate the capability
of posting to the charts area anonymously.

Jay

LONGER on IOMG

P.S. Given Ira's post #3687, it would appear that the CNBC power lunch report
did in fact move IOMG within 15 minutes. CNBC (un)witting manipulators of stock??
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext