SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lil Knubber who wrote (110092)12/11/2000 8:05:19 AM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
Yes, Dred Scott comes to mind. It will should Boise win his arguments to allow just a part of the uncounted votes to be counted. Boise plainly stated yesterday to Tony Snow on fox that it was the Bush lawyers who argued to count ALL the counties, not him. In a statewide race, Boise defines the need to count "uncounted" votes, then demands that only the portion Gore wants counted ought be counted, because Gore asked, not Bush. Absurd. If agreed to, absurd as the Dred Scott decision, thank-you. The Gore team plainly admits it doesn't want to count votes.

Boise told Russert yesterday he doesn't want to recover legitimate votes from the category called "overvotes," because Gore hadn't asked for those to be counted. Absurd as the Dred Scott decision, if bought. FSC bought it. USSC won't.

FSC added a partial Dade County count to be included- Mainly gore precincts represented. To heck with the rest of the precincts. Still, just counting countwide undervotes as directed instead of them all, BUSH picked up votes. Good for Bush....but it leaves him still with an unfair counting disadvantage in Dade County.

Boise thinks that just. USSC won't.

Dan B
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext