Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 170.65

+1.5%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Boplicity who wrote (89851)	12/11/2000 10:10:26 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 152472

I wonder if others will be able to use this against QCOM? It's seems to be a little crack in the patent armor. I dont think that this is the case. If I remember correctly, ETRI entered into a royalty sharing agreement with Qualcomm for CDMA infrastructure and handsets sold in Korea. The conflict came in when Qualcomm cited the fact that the contract specifically used the word "cellular". Qualcomm maintained that the royalty agreement did not apply to PCS (1800MHz) sales. Qualcomm withheld payments on all of the PCS sales (which now has been reversed). I dont see much impact towards any other licensees. My guess is that the exact situation is detailed in an SEC filing.... Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next