Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.6%

Jan 9 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: NITT who wrote (122124)	12/11/2000 5:21:52 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Nitt, The FSC appears to have failed to respond to that decision and instead said, ‘Start the counting from where you left off even after our deadline’. Am I missing something? I think some justices, namely O'Connor seemed slightly pi**ed about it. My first reaction after reading the 2nd FL SC ruling was that they chose a course of open defiance of the US SC, which is not a good thing to do IMO. Another, more cynical view is that the FL SC didn't want to hammer the last nail in Gore's coffin, and they just passed the buck to the US SC, which would do it for them, inciting the anger of the Sore Losers at the US SC, not at themselves. Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next