SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hickory who wrote (8884)12/12/2000 9:39:52 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (1) of 30051
 
Because you can't just pick which state's laws you want to abide by dependent on the outcome you desire. For an election in Florida, you have to abide by Florida laws.

In Florida, there is no definition of what votes count except the clear intent of the voter. If there is ambiguity, as in the case of dimples etc, then the intent is not clear, it is ambiguous, so the vote should not count. That is the law.

The laws in place are not necessarily giving this election a fair outcome. But the laws must be nevertheless abided by. The time to challenge those laws were before the election. I did not see Gore examining this issue then, unlike Bush in his state.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News