SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knight who wrote (112455)12/12/2000 3:29:16 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
1) A chad where no corners are detached (e.g. a "dimpled" or "pregnant" chad, or a "tri-chad") shall not be counted as a vote unless the ballot contains a pattern of dimpled chads. (If the voter punched chads all the way through in some races, they demonstrated that they knew how to properly vote; hence, you cannot assume that they intended to vote in the presidential race if they didn't punch it all the way through. The voter's intent was *not* clear.)


As a hypothetical, if a voter started by pushing firmly, but not firmly enough to dislodge the chad but eventually broke through, wouldn't that voter be inclined to continue pushing through from that point on?

My point being, there will be some problematic ballots that deserve arbitration, or the opinion of the chief judge or something. It might be easy to say the chad must bulge by X-micrometers, but what if the chad was pushed back into position by running through the card reader. Again, humans can see these things and arbitrary rules and machines cannot.

TP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext