SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: brad greene who wrote (19415)12/12/2000 6:20:36 PM
From: David  Read Replies (1) of 26039
 
Brad, I hate risking being wrong so quickly, but the longer it takes the Supreme Court to get a decision out, the better for Gore. A very quick decision would have almost certainly gone to Bush. My guess is that O'Conner will decide this one. She was upset that Florida hadn't addressed the earlier US Supreme Court decision. Then it did. I think it was O'Conner who learned from Boies that the Florida court's addition of the 383 votes were, in fact, perfectly legitimate (read the transcript of the US S. Ct. hearing). She was also probably part of the one or two justices concerned about the need for a stay to preserve an accurate count if uniform standards were adopted.

No prediction here that Gore wins, just that his chances are improved by this delay.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News