GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (3453)	12/12/2000 8:16:58 PM
From: rli123	Read Replies (1) of 5582

Anthony --- you say "Im not impressed one iota" with respect to the P&G announcement. Ok, please explain to me why this relationship is of no significance. Do you think P&G is in that habit of casually (and without doing any homework such as plant audits, etc.)doling out $1.625 mil? Do you think P&G would give that amount of money and formalize a research relationship with a company that you describe as a "firm doesnt exist and the whole thing is a farse"? While I don't pretend to know all the details of the GUMM relationship with P&G, I can tell you that P&G is one of the most conservative companies in the country, and they don't enter into a relationship with ANY company without doing a tremendous amount of due dilligence. And I can speak first hand about this, having personally been involved with P&G. Unfortunately for you, the facts just don't work for you. Unless you consider P&G to be a "farse" also. Why don't you articulate clearly your thoughts, rather than ranting and raving like a lunatic. rli

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next