SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kodiak_bull who wrote (81485)12/13/2000 12:08:34 AM
From: Think4Yourself  Read Replies (1) of 95453
 
The more I think about this the more I am impressed with the wording of the Supreme court decision. Think about what they have addressed:

1. The unfair subjectiveness of the recount was wrong
2. The recount idea itself is fine
3. The after-the-fact "count the votes" is irrelevant due to item 1
4. The court wasn't "wrong". It simply didn't set any standards, as required by the US Constitution, so the count that was stopped would have had to be redone anyways.
5. It's not "over" as far as they are concerned. That is up to the state of Florida.

I think they addressed all the current issues and the upcoming ones, and I now have more respect than ever for the Supreme Court. Well done!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News