Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.7%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (122398)	12/13/2000 1:05:36 AM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Elmer - Re:"By a 7-2 margin the USSC agreed with the more reasonable opinions on the Intel thread that the divining of dimpled chads was bogus and a violation of the equal protection clause of the US Constitution." Learn how to count!! The opinion was 5 to 4. Dissenters Souter and Breyer wanted a single standard for all counties. Dimples would have been OK if all counties used the same rule. They indicated that the problems were caused by the interference of the Court and might have been fixed by the Florida court in the recount if the Court had allowed the count to finish.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next