SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Amateur Traders Corner
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Druss who wrote (4197)12/13/2000 9:21:47 AM
From: Fundamentls  Read Replies (5) of 19633
 
Yes, Druss, I agree. The Supreme Court has just changed the principle of suffrage from "one person, one vote" to "one justice, one vote." They could have decided the case on the merits and IMO come down either way (and I have no real preference between the two candidates). Instead, they have said that the vote should be counted, but golly gosh, it's too late. Yet of course it was they and they alone who issued the stay that prevented the vote from being counted before it was too late.

IMO President-elect-apparent Bush was elected by Justices Kennedy and O'Connor, and they didn't even bother to make it look non-political. Yesterday's decision will go down as one of the darkest days in the history of the Supreme Court.

It is indeed a sad day for American democracy.

Regards,
Fund
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News