SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LowtherAcademy who wrote (86765)12/13/2000 12:51:40 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
lew, i don't blame the us supreme court. they did what they could with what they had to work with.

* al gore trying to manipulate a win in an extremely unfair manner.
* a fl supreme court that doesn't understand basic fairness or common sense - even when it is slapping it across the face. they believe "count all the votes" means "count only those votes al gore wants to count" (screw the voters!) when called on their piss poor call, they changed the definition to "count all the votes necessary to enable those votes al gore wants counted to be counted" (screw voter AGAIN!) and screw the rest of the state.

the constitutional problem with the fl supreme court's actions crossed party lines - both within and outside the fl supreme court. only the remedy was deeply divided.

al gore lost b/c he tried to manipulate and cherry pick a win. al gore lost b/c the fl supreme court was incapable of designing a plan that was good for VOTERS instead of AL GORE. so much time was wasted trying to manipulate a win that time ran out.

there is no doubt the fl supreme court's "remedies" were patently unfair to the voters of florida.

what is a us supreme court gonna do?

jmho, and i know reasonable people can, and will, disagree on the meaning of this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext