SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 46.96-2.8%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (122579)12/13/2000 12:52:06 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
John,

No. It means the state retains it's sovereignty, to make and interpret by it's own courts, laws, without federal intervention. Controling elections at the state level is (sorry, was) probably the most important of these rights.

I think you have a good point. My opinion before and during the 1st case was that the biggest risk to Bush was that the US SC does not take the case, or that they refuse to rule. But on the merits of the case, Bush side had an excellent case, both from the perspective of law, and from a basic principle of fairness, so once the USSC took the case, the outcome was not that tough to predict.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News