Suzanne...
"v?gas's" posts in tone and with all of his name calling
exude hate and acrimony as well
as falsehoods, then he has the audacity to call
others "sick" and "tasteless".
Apparently he does lack the necessary self awareness
to comprehend the intrinsic irony of his posts.
Regarding falsehoods, first some inane comment about my
20 to 30 posts a day on RB....that are more like 2 or 3
if even that many per day. Now his comments about my
filing a complaint against tsig,
which is also not accurate. I shared info about message
board participants on both of the extreme sides of the aisle
....the hypes and the bashers.
I have concurred with many who have noted that some
of the people have gone too far with disclosure, and agreed
such "longs" have hurt the company more so than some of
the "bashers". I've disagreed with you on several
of these people.
However, I still put the company in the context of
the sector, and the market while analyzing the model.
I have a long time frame, and understand the risk.
I have not explicitly told anyone to buy, and I've
also stated the risks quite specifically. Moreover,
I've admitted I've both wrong, at times too emotional,
and still may not be correct. Following tigi, cmgi,
rrrr, sfe, pnlk, eggs, amzn, elon, and many others has been
quite an edifying experience. I've made big money, and
lost big money....I've also witnessed repeatedly the
sickness of greed demonstrated by others whose opinions
change wildly based on whether they are "in" or "out".
In the context of what's transpire in the sector,
such heated extreme antagonistic rhetoric like that
of v?gas is just childish especially when daily you
read about other Inets closing or laying off 25% of their
work forces. The bubble has burst. Many more
companies than tigi were pumped and way more
fraudulent in their accounting. Plus these companies
were pumped by big named analysis’s of their
underwriters who made wild price projections
leading to much more exaggerated hopes and wild price swings.
Yet our "saviors" with their sanctimonious claims
of goodwill and fair play, say they are here to protect
others from the likes of us for being analytical....
sometimes correctly, many times incorrectly, and imo
too early really to tell.
Again whether tigi is ultimately successful imo
won't be determinable for awhile. However, I don't
think tsig is any less successful than companies
that reported gross sales of 100 mill yet whose
cost of goods were 99 mill with advertising costs
of 50 mill, that have burnt through over 100 mill
annually. Yet according to some of the white knights
here false accounting meaning "revenues" some how seems
to be some how more meritorious.
For me the Penzoil deal is quite promising, any
new Coca Cola deal will be re-affirming, and I'm
still waiting to see Affinity's numbers publicly disclosed.
Is that "hype"? or when I also note, that if Affinity's
PR noted numbers turn out to be bogus, that I'd consider
a class action suit for fraud..does that not mitigate the
"hype"...Couldn't such a qualifier be construed
as "bashing"? Or is there no room for objective conversation
without extremist rhetoric and name calling?
Heck Suzanne, now it seems here and on RB that the
"saviors" posts now out number the "hypes" posts
quite significantly. Yet the "saviors" speak of contradicting
the hypes while attempting to censor
any guardedly optimistic sentiments...
So, again ironically, now it seems there
is a need for balance to balance out the "saviors".
Again irony abounds.
z |
