SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (115800)12/14/2000 12:19:38 PM
From: Master (Hijacked)  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
"There is no other rational basis because the decision is contrary to their past judicial philosophy."

Hmmmm....no basis for their rationale. I don't suppose that "selective recounting standards" is good enough reason for you? What about an all Democrat Florida Supreme Court which overstepped its authority and rewrote the laws governing elections? Oh, and what about a democratic candidate which only wants his votes counted while using the legal system to try and reject all ballots which might favor the other candidate?

Hmmm......maybe you're right! Other than these reasons and half a dozen others which I didn't list, I really don't see why the USSC should have taken this case.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext