SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (386)12/15/2000 9:12:56 PM
From: SBHX  Read Replies (1) of 644
 
If the axiom of choice was true, then it follows that the well ordering principle is true for any subset of real numbers.

Note as a corollary that the analog scale that governs dimpleness of a ballot can be well-ordered. Meaning that in any set containing the scale of dimpleness of a ballot, there is always a unique smallest dimple.

(vbg) WLOG, the state of dimpleness with clear intent is obviously analogous to the set of real numbers in (0,1) -- because these are the undervotes right?. (vbg)

Or perhaps, since there is a known upper bound to the number of atoms in each chad, we only need to deal with rational numbers in (0,1)? Interesting idea.

SbH
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News