Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (5208)	12/19/2000 5:12:18 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (4) of 28931

The definition between "me" and "not me" is missing. What is with you guys? This precept seems so central and obvious (to me). That's why I guess it will have to remain a personal philosophy!! Both you and Mitch seem to think the line between "me" and "not me" is very blurry. For me it isn't. I find my life (my perceived reality) goes better when I incorporate the not-me into it so my "me" philosophy isn't one of "selfishness" or of being "self-centered". You guys seem to have the senses on the inside of the "me" wall. For my personal "me", the senses are part of the "not me" interface. Senses can be easily fooled so they are distinctly not me in that case (if I can judge my senses to be wrong, then they aren't me cuz "me" is never wrong). If I accept the senses as wrong they are outside of "me" and puts them into the category of things that you can't necessarily believe. "Me" is never wrong in the moment, but may be discovered to be wrong later (pending new thought or data) in which case I realign "me" to the truth.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next