SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (129917)12/20/2000 12:52:45 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) of 1570668
 
Scumbria,

If Iran launched a nuclear missile at Israel, what do you think the response would be from the US?

A little thought is required here.


Before or after the US designed missile shield was put in place?

If after, I think the response would be a prayer that the system works and people operate it correctly.

If the missile was launched before a missile shield was put in place, like today, the only think the US could do is to hope that the casualties are low. Hopefully, a retaliation would destroy or set back the Iranian nuclear capabilities.

But the retaliation is irrelevant to the people who launched the missiles in the first place. I think they share the mentality with the suicide bombers. Mostly innocent people would end up getting hurt in any US retaliation.

Your earlier argument, if I understand it correctly is that there is no point in trying to defend against attack A with countermeasure A1, since the existence of countermeasure A1 will cause the attacker to switch to attack B.

I disagree. Having response A1 makes weapon A useless, and all the attacker can do is to use weapon B. That is until we develop a defense B1.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext