Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cosmicforce who wrote (5247)	12/20/2000 3:17:44 PM
From: Mitch Blevins	Read Replies (1) of 28931

cosmic, would you agree to the following? 1) There is "me". 2) There is not-me. 3) The not-me obeys physical laws (although subject to incompleteness and imprecision of our models) 4) The "me" does not necessarily have to obey these laws, or has a completely different set of laws. 5) The not-me can effect the "me". 6) The "me" can effect the not-me. 7) Therefore, the not-me can break physical laws by acting in a causal chain through the "me". (to effect, for example, time travel).

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next