SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MikeM54321 who wrote (9887)12/21/2000 10:15:22 PM
From: MikeM54321  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
PS Whoops. As I read more details I see the WSJ got the issue wrong. It was not a forced access issue. I believe it's the 99-238 issue that SBC was fighting with the FCC on. Very briefly 99-238 says, "If you run packet service to the remote terminal, you don't have to give competitors a free ride on it." But the details are as fuzzy as a Florida election.

See this url for more details than you want to know:
Message 13206558

...If 99-238 holds, then other incumbents will be eager to take advantage of the groundwork SBC laid. SBC says it's going ahead with NGDLC rollouts finally. Started in September 2000(after a one year delay). Now what's most interesting--Wonder what agreement they came too?? -MikeM(From Florida)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News