SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (6559)12/24/2000 6:30:11 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) of 6710
 
No doubt the best argument for succession by the larger states that could be presented. But, of course, it takes a lot more data to figure in the costs of unnecessary federal regulation of the land in the smaller states, most of whom are much larger geographically. Plus the cost of unnecessary federal interference in their internal affairs. Perhaps some of the quiet achievements I expect from the new administration will include forcing the feds to disclose the costs of their meddling, and that will certainly make the funds flow balance look very different. I fully support economic impact statements as a legal requirement before any federal regulation can be enforced. Let's let the people see what they are paying for, and their outrage will, IMO, be reborn...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News