Impact of little or no capital gains windfall for the state and federal govt's needs to be factored into this tiring economy..........................
State's fate tied to stocks
By Aldo Svaldi Denver Post Business Writer
Dec. 24, 2000 - Colorado's early economic fate rested on the cost of gold and silver. Later it was tied to farm prices and then petroleum prices.
Today, the Nasdaq composite index could hold Colorado's future. It's down 40 percent for the year.
What people may not realize is that the state is much more dependent on the stock market than at any time in the past, economists said.
"I think technology weakness is leading the economic slowdown in the U.S. That will have an impact on Colorado,"
said Sung Won Sohn, chief economic officer at Wells Fargo Bank.
What economists don't know is how stormy things will get next year. Most call for a soft landing, or gradual slowdown, but a prolonged correction in technology and telecommunications could point to something harder.
"I think in 2001 you are going to see slower growth, no question," said Nancy McCallin, the governor's chief economist.
McCallin and Sohn are among 10 economists who gave The Denver Post a glimpse into the future. They face the unenviable task of trying to predict the weather as clouds form on a sunny day that has lasted 10 years.
A few lightning bolts and the whole forecast changes.
"None of the Western states can ignore a national recession," said Tracy Clark, senior economist with the Bank One Economic Outlook Center at Arizona State University.
If the national economy lands softly, so will the economies of the Western states. Same with a hard landing. The West's isolation might remain a romantic ideal, but reality will set in if things get ugly nationally, he said.
The Western Blue Chip Economic Forecast that Clark oversees forecasts slower but solid growth rates in most areas. Single-family home permits are an exception. They are expected to fall for the second year in a row.
The forecast's seven economists expect Colorado to enjoy a 7.3 percent increase in current personal income, down from 8.2 percent this year. Retail sales growth will cool to 6.4 percent from 8.4 percent.
The Colorado Business Economic Outlook from the University of Colorado expects fewer people to move to the state and for home construction to slow down. But the state's job machine is expected to churn out 61,800 net new jobs. Per-capita income is expected to jump from $32,500 to $34,264.
Normally, those numbers would indicate strength. But coming off the strong growth Colorado as enjoyed, they mark a change.
One thing the economists aren't predicting is a surging state economy.
Six interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve through June of this year have accomplished their mission of slowing the economy. U.S. economic growth in the third quarter hit 2.2 percent, compared with 5.6 percent for the first half of the year. The Nasdaq composite index is down more than 40 percent for the year. Retail sales point to weaker Christmas spending. Consumer confidence is slipping.
Some key economic indicators are starting to point to an easing in the local economy, said U.S. Bank economist Tucker Hart Adams. But with unemployment low and wages rising, it isn't anything the average Coloradan can feel yet, she said.
Bill Kendall, an economist with the Center for Business and Economic Forecasting, said he sees no hard evidence of a slowdown in Colorado yet.
If anything, economists who follow the state have bumped up their estimates for 2000. For the last several years, forecasters have underestimated the state's strength and have had to play catch up.
Nationally, economists are getting more pessimistic. Forecasters who wouldn't mention recession are now hedging their bets.
Sohn has raised his estimates of a recession to 40 percent.
Kendall defines a soft landing as economic growth in the 3 percent to 4 percent range. A hard landing would take it down to 1 percent growth. With a recession, the economy would shrink for at least two quarters.
Vectra Bank Colorado economist Jeff Thredgold puts himself in the soft-landing camp. He expects monetary officials to drop rates quickly if they see a rapid slowdown. Quick action and well-timed interest-rate cuts saved the U.S. economy in 1998 from a downturn. "The Federal Reserve is on our side," he said.
Jeff Romine, a regional economist with the Denver Regional Council of Governments said a downturn could provide a welcome breather. He predicts fewer people moving into the Denver area, which should give the region time to catch up on its development needs.
Fewer people means fewer housing units will be built.
The Colorado Business Economic Outlook is looking at total housing units to drop to 46,000 in 2001 from 54,000 this year. Construction hiring is expected to slow significantly.
Construction resources will shift away from building buildings to adding infrastructure and preparing lots for the next housing upswing. Penn Pfiffner, a consulting economist with Construction Economist in Lakewood, said that the construction of infrastructure, from bridges to power plants, should hit $1.9 billion next year - more than the $1.7 billion the region spent during the construction peak at Denver International Airport in 1992.
Economists admit their predictions are more accurate if they're following a trend. It is tougher to catch a major shift in the economy, good or bad, until it is well under way.
Colorado's economy is more diverse than it was 10 years ago, which makes it more dependent on national trends, including the stock market's swings.
The stock market's decline is already putting a pinch on the city's large mutual-fund families based in Denver and Cherry Creek. The amount of money they're managing has shrunk, cutting into their fees.
But the market's influence runs deeper. Many of Colorado's old corporations were culled during years of manic merger activity in the late 1990s.
New technology and telecommunications start-ups rose to take their place, often funded with generous venture capital. Investors snapped up initial public offerings and debt flowed freely like intravenous solution into the arms of the capital-hungry telecommunications industry.
In that regard, the party is over.
A Denver Post survey found that through mid-December, the stock prices of nearly a quarter of 60 Colorado telecommunications and technology companies were down 90 percent or more from their highs. Those 60 companies have lost $184 billion in market value, and the bleeding has accelerated as the year draws to a close.
Low stock prices translate into worthless options for executives and hiring freezes and layoffs at some companies. Start-up companies now find the capital markets closed to them long before they can support themselves.
Will things ease before those companies starve to death?
"Some of the bloom is off the rose," Thredgold said. "Some of those companies were adding people any time they could find them. They are now letting some of them go."
Thredgold said Colorado will face the perils of living and dying by the technology sword. Colorado in 1998 claimed the highest concentration of technology workers on a per-capita basis of any state in the country, according to the American Electronics Association.
Technology contributed to the region's boom. A down cycle in technology could work the other way, economists said.
Colorado's technology companies are not alone in their suffering.
Stock investors had counted on a Thanksgiving rally and it didn't happen. They held hopes for a Christmas rally, which still hasn't materialized. Investors hold plenty of cash, but most market watchers don't expect them to jump back in unless they see better prospects for corporate earnings, which have slowed with the economy.
Sohn estimates that 20 percent of consumer spending is tied to the wealth effect, which is the financial security people gain from rising stock and home values.
He forecasts retail sales will grow at a slower pace next year. If the decline is severe enough, a "negative" wealth effect could take hold. Rather than spending, consumers start saving.
State tax collections also could take a hit if the market's downturn continues. Years of large capital gains have boosted Colorado incomes. McCallin said capital gains now represent 12 percent of state income, up from only 3 or 4 percent five years ago.
As a result, Colorado ranks as one of the most capital gains-dependent states in the country.
If taxpayers start harvesting losses, incomes will fall. Beleaguered companies are less likely to pay out bonuses - another strain.
From TABOR, the tax-andspending limitation law, to the recently passed Amendment 23 for school funding, the state's budgetary hands are getting tied tighter and tighter.
McCallin said the state's ability to respond to a downturn with fiscal policies is now limited.
While economists aren't expecting a recession next year, they said one will eventually come.
McCallin said a recession is almost a certainty within the next three to five years.
Adams, the U.S. Bank economist, said a mild recession by 2002 would not surprise her.
If the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates to shore up the economy and the Bush administration hands out generous tax cuts, that would stimulate the economy.
Adams said wage pressures remain tight because of a worker shortage caused by demographics and job growth. Colorado's wage gains have outpaced the nation and inflation has run higher here, 3.7 percent, than in the rest of the nation, 3.3 percent.
Higher energy prices are now part of the mix as well. Inflation could rear its ugly head, and the Federal Reserve will be forced to put on the brakes once more.
Tim Sheesley, corporate economist for Xcel Energy, said higher energy prices are not only inflationary, but could also tip the economy into a recession.
Natural gas prices are nearly triple the levels of a year ago. Burned too many times, petroleum producers have moved more slowly to increase supply. One of the colder winters in recent years has made the problem worse.
"There is nothing people notice more quickly than when they get that bill for heating their house. Energy costs can cause a meltdown in the economy," he said.
A meltdown may be extreme, but expect 2001 to be a year for caution. |