SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Senior who wrote (11644)12/28/2000 11:18:18 AM
From: voodooist  Read Replies (1) of 78921
 
Hya Paul, re TXT--thanks for your analysis. I like it here, seems to have lost the bottom (hate myself every time I don't buy because of a couple of points)). IMHO, the best value to the shareholders would be if they spun off the aircraft business, which could be a nice fit for UTX or BA. Also, the land systems, could be a nice fit for GD or United Defense (Carlyle Group). Then, we may see another NNS phenomenon. The two spun-off businesses would sky-rocket while the remaining portion would find itself where TEN is today. DISCLAIMER: This is all pure fantasy and I am not the CEO, nor the investment banker <GGG>.
I did, though, buy a ton of NNS after the spin-off from TEN. Invested, and traded that one a ton, but very sadly missed a lot of the last rise. That one is conspicuously missing from my IRA, which is like a small defense mutual fund <.
P.S. Have you looked at PTV? It was the old TEN (now automotive, trading as a penny stock <G>, but PTV was the last spinoff, the packaging component.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext