Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 169.42

-2.2%

2:15 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rajala who wrote (90879)	12/28/2000 12:48:21 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Hey, cosmopolite, citizen of the world, smartest guy around, lover of tattoo'd women and shaved legs, answer one question: Why does Nokia take the position that the original CDMA license it obtained from Q is sufficient for WCDMA? Nokia is obviously willing to pay the Q for its essential WCDMA IPR, but the Q says "Thanks, but the royalties are higher for 3G." All that's left to fret about is how much Nokia is going to pay the Q for 3G. The money is in the bag. Except for the fact that it will be a lot of cash because the 3G license will be more expensive than the CDMA One license, the only thing we don't know how is exactly how much Nokia is going to fork over. In other words, herring-breath, Nokia knows and admits that it's hooked (says so on its web site) but wants to negotiate for a better deal. Your post is as senselessly bizarre as your reasoning.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next