SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis
SPY 659.03+1.0%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: flatsville who wrote (65417)12/28/2000 5:34:11 PM
From: jmootx  Read Replies (2) of 99985
 
Bush only has to be concerned with 2002-2004. If the economy tanks for 2001 and even into 2002, then so be it. If it recovers by 2004 he will be re-elected. Voters do not want to risk a change so soon during a recovery.

And I disbelieve that the average voter is going to blame it on Bush. The stock market made people feel poor last Spring and Summer, and this Fall's decline was the icing on the cake. They voted with their wallets, not only ousting Gore, but went slow at X-mas. The vast majority accept the press as biased, so it is more of a family dinner table decision. Why can't Sally get her Mustang this X-Mas?? Mom and Dad tell her it is because their stocks sank all year.

The key is that Greenspan will not cut rates IMO at the end of January if Bush pushes tax relief during the first days of his administration. The January rally will lift stocks, adding to the deterrent to lower rates. As long as unemployment remains below 5%, Greenspan will not act. That has been his true gripe all along. Full employment is the hazard to Greenspan above all else, IMO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext