Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 179.91

-0.8%

12:05 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rajala who wrote (90936)	12/29/2000 3:17:28 PM
From: EJhonsa	Read Replies (3) of 152472

Its delightful to see how marginalmike uses skillfully higher level abstract reasoning here. Especially the "pattent search" was a masterstroke. Couldn´t have put it better myself. Please download the following file and turn to page 179/249: itu.int And while you're at it, take a look at the source for the Nokia comments carranza was talking about: nokia.com I'm responding to you right now under the assumption that you're merely a misinformed skeptic looking for clarification on a few issues surrounding Qualcomm, and not a pathetic troll who continues to make inane comments whose validity you're highly uncertain of, but couldn't care less about, since you're only goal is take a sadistic pleasure in irritating and annoying those who post and lurk here by means of putting out such innuendo. If, after going through the sources I've brought up, you still somehow persist on stating that Qualcomm's W-CDMA patent position is negligible or nonexistant, I'll have no choice but to conclude that my assumption was well off the mark. Eric

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next