Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (130181)	12/29/2000 9:03:50 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) of 1571404

The cost of toilet seats in the 80s is not relevant because the military is no longer spending that amount on toilet seats. It does serve as an example of waste, but there is weasteful spending in every major governemnt program. Would you argue against any increase for social programs (both entitlements and social programs that fall under "discresionary spending") until all waste is eliminated? How would you react to an argument that social programs or programs for environmnetal protection should not be increased because back in the 80s there was some example of stupid wastful spending Tim, What makes you think the wasteful spending stopped in the 80's? ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next