>>You're just basically wrong. You assembled portfolios -- with selections and timing intended to document your conclusions -- a few months ago. This is another reason why I wish that you had never set foot in a lab; scientists don't fit data to a conclusion.<<
If there were a better example of pathological fact-creation, it's yet to appear on SI. And your suggestion regarding as to who has earned their bench stripes is pure fantasy... worse than the ever-expanding malfeasance you continue to concoct for my behavior (suffice to say that post 153 was an UPDATE of the portfolios...portfolios created at the end of October with a minimum time horizon of 6 months with a self-imposed stipulation that no changes were permitted...that's the correct, DEductive - not INductive, perspective here)
You appear to be psychologically unable to resist the need to display your defensiveness regarding biotech investing and SI. Sorry to inform you Richie but my post was NOT intended for you - it was meant in general for the lingering hubris on SI, hubris which I witnessed in full self-righteous force earlier this year on SEM and biotech threads. Believe it or not Richie, you're not the only one around here exuding excessive hubris - the SEMs boards of full of it (especially the AMAT thread) - and my posting record will display my exchanges with folks regarding this.
So the answer to your question, ' Now who could you be referring to?' is: NOT YOU! But for god's sake it sure says something about yourself that you felt this overwhelming need to respond...with a compilation of data that performs the precise type of absurd selectivity you accuse me off! >>And yet you draw monumental conclusions?!<<
Amen.
I've made a significant amount of money for myself over the past five years despite any claims you make to inside knowledge of my actual investments. I've hardly 'touted' my experience with the Ariad warrants 'all year long'; in any event, the frequency of my noting ARIAW pales in comparison to your ongoing touting of Biotech even as the sector has collapsed during the last third of the year. Your desperate need to disparage those who form opinions contrary to your own clouds everything you say and makes your posts here boorish and adolescent. I've no idea what sort of bench scientist you are nor you me; nothing of your opinions voiced on SI suggests insights nor judgements beyond mine or any of the other scientists here. However your inability to refrain from the fiction/garbage you spew out on this thread makes one 'wish that you had never set foot in a lab; scientists don't fit data to a conclusion.' to 'steal' your words (and you know how I just can't stop myself from lying, cheating, stealing, raping, pillaging).
And then, Richie, there's this whole question of 'Aurileano' on SI. You are 'Richard Harmon' AND you are 'Aurileano'. Are all the folks on the T/FIF, Biotech News, Trickle etc threads aware of your double identity?
Not only are YOU wrong, but you're a flagrant hypocrite.
Your soapbox needs deconstructing...before it collapses from its own weight. |
