Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 43.75

+0.6%

Dec 3 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (123908)	12/31/2000 12:57:11 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (5) of 186894

EP,<<<Lets give credit where credit is due. AMD does hurt Intel's ASPs. AMD forces Intel to lower the cost of processors aimed at the consumer market and there's no denying that. In turn that drags down even the business ASPs where AMD has essentially no presence.>>> Competition is good. Otherwise Intel would be a monopoly, and I would agree that monopolies are probably not good for anyone. If Intel can't compete against AMD, then they don't deserve to succeed. But, let's face it. AMD has quite a track record when it comes to competing against Intel. Jerry Sanders has a 30 year track record of creating wealth mostly for himself and losing money for shareholders. What was that saying, "you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time"? It is amazing that he can still generate so much support from Dan3, Kap4kan, and a lot of others on this and the AMD threads. Must be the Stockholm syndrom. Mary

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next