SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sunfish who wrote (3277)1/4/2001 6:37:00 PM
From: Mang Cheng  Read Replies (1) of 6784
 
sunfish, thank you for explaining your strategy. I tend to agree with you almost 100%. The problem was I didn't use such strategy last year. There are two reasons why I couldn't employ such strategy at around the end of 2000 :

1. We underestimated the downside risk of Palm. I thought $45 maybe $40 was the lowest it would sink. I then loaded up around this $40-$55 level. If we had listened to the short-sellers, the downside risk was actually at $15-20. The subsequent actual drop to $22 really screwed up all my other plans.

2. Most small investors (that's me) have a serious pyschological barrier - when I sold a stock (or even just a small portion) and if it goes up more, I'd feel extremely depress, angry, frustrated and totally lost control. Whereas if I bought a stock and it went down, I wouldn't feel a thing since I would be hopful that it would come back up very quickly. I am glad to report that starting 2001 I have conquered this barrier. From now on, I won't give a hiss if I sold a stock and it goes up more - for I know it will eventually come back down - havn't we seen enough of this in Palm last year ? I just have to follow a pre-set strategy similar (not 100% the same) to the one sunfish outlined.

Mang
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext