Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 181.30

-0.5%

Dec 11 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: EJhonsa who wrote (90952)	1/5/2001 9:34:49 AM
From: Rajala	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Thank you Eric for the links. Its a pleasure to debate with a guy like you who comes with the facts, for a change, not like "its there on the web go and search for it yourself" (no names mentioned but it was that carranza6 guy). So the question was whether there is an N admission about the need for a Q agreement or not. After listening to the N info meeting recording I must admit there were too many ums and errs for my comfort (I´m speaking from a position of a Q sceptic). However, there is no admission. They are confident that they will reach an agreement sometime in the future. There is no hurry. Alcatel and Siemens seem to be sitting on their hands also. What are all these guys waiting for? The circuit switched WAP has not been a commercial success yet. GPRS is still way behind its commercial take-off, even the phones are not out yet en masse. EDGE is in the distant future. So is it only a waiting game? If so, why? Is there an expectancy of current or future leverage i.e. is Q´s IPR position on WCDMA not unassailable? - rajala

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next