SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : JAVA GOLD
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: robingrayson who wrote (106)1/5/2001 5:55:18 PM
From: RICHARD GIANNOBLE  Read Replies (1) of 121
 
ROBIN-

GREAT JOB WITH THE TWO JAVA GOLD REPORTS. HOWEVER, WE STILL NEED A STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO ELECT CORPORATE OFFICIALS WHO CAN THEN HAVE AUTHORITY TO FIND A THIRD PARTY TO PAY-OFF DEBTS AND MOVE FORWARD. DO WE KNOW WHO THE STOCKHOLDERS ARE AND HOW TO CONTACT THEM FOR AN EMERGENCY MEETING?

I STILL HAVE A REAL PROBLEM WITH ARMAND SELLING 60% INTEREST WHEN THE CORPORATION HAD NO OTHER OFFICERS. THE BUYERS HAD AN OBLIGATION TO UNDERSTAND WHO THEY WERE BUYING FROM AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ASSETS TO STOCKHOLDERS. THE BUYERS SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ARMAND DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO SELL A 60% SHARE. THEREFORE , I QUESTION THE CONTRACT EVEN IN MONOGLIA.

WITH ONLY A 40% REMAINING SHARE , I QUESTION THE ECONOMICS AFTER DEBTS ARE PAID AND OPERATIONAL EXPENSES ARE FIGURED IN AT TODAY'S GOLD PRICE.

COMMENTS ?

YOUR FRIEND ,

RICK GIANNOBLE
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News