SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.500-1.3%Dec 30 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (8692)1/6/2001 3:55:30 PM
From: Puck  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
You're right, of course, that as a Nokia shareholder I'm not happy about any of their failings. I'm not as pessimistic as you about whether or not Nokia has used up its chances with Verizon. If Nokia, in the future, comes out with popular, differentiated phones that meet Verizon's specifications, I have trouble accepting the idea that Verizon would just ignore them. Also, I did present a list of nineteen carriers, including such luminous names as Sprint, Alltel, and Quest, that have no problems with the 6185i on their CDMA networks and am quite vexed by Verizon's anamolous position. What could possibly be going on at Verizon that isn't at the other nineteen. If there were, as you speculate, non-uniform standards for two-way text messaging amongst CDMA networks, what are the odds that the ratio of those having trouble with two-way text messaging utilizing the 5185i against those that do not would be as extreme as possible: 1 : 19. I guess that the law of averages would tend to imply that Verizon would be not alone. I wonder, as a control, whether any of the other mobile phone vendors have also had trouble getting their phones to work with Verizon or if this is an isolated quirk. Really, what could be the difference between Verizon and the others?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext