SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (94)1/9/2001 4:52:06 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
But the first amendment isn't about private individuals and organizations limiting speech in their domain, it is about the Government limiting speech. I believe that someone can be a strong advocate of the first amendment and still have the desire limit expression in their domains.

If I have a rule in my house that nobody says the word "shit", and a guest comes over and says "shit", then I have the right kick them out of my house.

If a business has a corporate policy stating that political discussions are not welcome inside their walls, that business has the right to restrict that speech.

Neither one of these conflicts with the first amendment.

On the Piffer OT thread, we had a rule that political discussions would be limited to how they affected the market. A guy named Asenna1 came over and started spewing his political rhetoric on the thread. I politely asked him to leave and he came back with more. I got a bit pissed at the guy and asked him to leave again (he turned me in for a TOU violation, BTW). In your opinion, since the thread header clearly states the policy on political discussions, do you think that I would have been unreasonable if I had moderated him off of the thread? (the piffer OT thread is not moderated, so it is an academic question).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext