SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimbaBear who wrote (11818)1/11/2001 6:14:01 PM
From: tyc:>  Read Replies (2) of 78476
 
Free Cash Flow evaluation

>>I also have a problem with adding back all Depreciation and Amortization due to opinion I have that some of it really is a loss of useful value and therefore should not be added back.

I too am groping here but....

If you are evaluating an enterprise on the basis of FREE CASH FLOW then perhaps you should not be concerned about such concepts as "loss of useful value". ALL past capital expenditures are extraneous to your evaluation.... they simply represent moneys spent in the past. What needs to be evaluated is present and future cash flows only.

I wonder if it is necessary to differentiate between cash flow and FREE cash flow. I wonder if one could treat ALL current and future capital expenditures as "self supporting". If "maintenance" capital expenditures do not enhance future cash flows, they will at least extend the term of your evaluation model thus enhancing its PV. The problem would thus become one of providing a rational finite life to the enterprise i.e. limiting the number of payments in your DCF evaluation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext