SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CVJ who wrote (531)1/12/2001 9:22:26 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 23908
 
Only individuals would be allowed to contribute to individual candidates and legitimate Parties only, no PACS

While I agree that groups and corporations should not be able to contribute (after all, they can't vote), I would have to express concern about limiting the ways in which individuals are permitted to contribute to PACS, or other advocacy groups (soft money).

After all, the ability to contribute money is an additional means of casting one's vote, with their checks representing their "ballot", as well as an expression of freedom of speech and association. To bar it is to potentially violate an individual's 1st amendment rights.

While it is legal to limit the amount of money that can be individually contributed to a particular candidate, to limit someone's ability to express their opinion via support for soft money political interest groups is a line that I think we should be very careful in crossing.

Regards,

Ron
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext