General Magic Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : General Magic

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Seconds Out who wrote (9300)	1/17/2001 9:25:44 PM
From: Kurthend	Read Replies (3) of 10081

Seconds, My first reaction at today's NUAN and GM announcement was s...., we are hosed. After thinking about the PR I changed my mind. It would make sense that GM would want to expand its voice recognition capabilities and go straight to the source. Not all speech technology will need a NOC. Besides, GM would want to ensure that the speech recognition supplied by NUAN be the best. Why go through GMGC? Something I don't think I have ever seen is a PR from two companies that mentions a third company in a one liner (ie protect a third party/company). It seems as though there was a concerted effort by GM, NUAN and even possibly GMGC to ensure that everyone understood that GMGC would not be left holding the bag (GMGC would still host the technology at the NOC). The question I have as always with GMGC is, "why?" What does GM and NUAN have to gain to put that one liner in the PR? Did GMGC insist that some mention of GMGC be placed in the PR (and why)? If so then GMGC knows exactly what the hell is going on and is not being left in the dark IMO. Take care. Kurt

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next