*OT* Bob, if your mild mannerism blows a gasket folks will blame me.
Did I completely miss the point of your post and go off on some wierd verbose tangent.
no
The above no requires one to re-examine if your second observation was an appropriate answer, as in correct, if I answered yes that you are correct rather than the no which brings into question the validity of your conclusion as to my intent to follow from that which could be a false positive in a negative sense.
Let me explain further Bob.
But first, your "Nevermind ...... sorry to have bothered you."
No mind does my mind towards those who change their mind.
Its almost that you did a variation of what you said, "... went off on some wierd verbose tangent.", as you retracted, as in a bounced backwards.
Its really ok Bob, i understand your difficulty with the methods used by GATA in their battles towards those evil corrupt and criminal gold manipulators.
Study history Bob and you will discover that the freedom you enjoy today has a foundation build not only with that which identifies to you good and honest means and methods, but also just the opposite which was not only used by folks you would not like to take credit for, but also by those who you think fought the "good" battle.
Fight Fire with Fire is this ok Bob or are there exceptions or conditions that over-rule "in the name of humanity don't" who determines if the end can justify the means decide, not based on rule of laws made by man but decide based on life=survival Ayn Rand has written on this topic
off topic # 2 -------------
Is the goozoon really too tight for hutch-chew? This thread is aWaiting 4 him to CrushaGataLand. The last post i 2 him, possible pr00f of gold manipulation to tell us all why its garbage & wrong & ClueLess.
ak |